Stem cell research is a double edged sword. On one hand, the potential benefits to science, humanity and health are immense, and on the other hand it can be plagued with ethical and moral dilemmas involving life, cells, tissue and some may say - playing God.
Scientists in Britain are developing a technique to cultivate live tissue from the stem cells in dead embryos. This tends to escape any moral dilemma as the cells are no longer dividing and are considered dead. Dead tissue, brought to life. Nothing wrong there! I don’t have to explain much to illustrate where this is going.
Tissue Regeneration.
Setting aside all ethical and moral dilemmas about cultivating and developing stem cells and where they are harvested, stem cell research will progress and it will yield strange new results to us. There are certain things that should be brought up when considering a futurist look at stem cells. Specifically, tissue regeneration and reanimation. It is not so far fetched to consider - stem cells bear the unique property of being able to form into any cell the body needs, liver, heart, arm, brain. Perhaps in twenty to fifty years, we will have reached the point where stem cell therapy will allow quadriplegics to walk and the dismembered to grow new limbs. This is fantastic. And terrifying.
From the Max Planck Institutes:
“the possibility of regenerating the complex structures of entire organs, such as the kidneys for example, is already conceivable, although a comprehensive understanding of the organogenesis is necessary”.
Activating stem cells to produce or grow new tissue, organs and limbs is a scary and unknown frontier for biotechnology, especially since technicians are reanimating them to begin with. Certain questions are brought to mind:
- How will developing tissues be controlled?
- Is there a limit on what will be grown or developed?
- How large a tissue sample can be reanimated?
- Will reanimated tissue samples take on the characteristics of HeLa cells?
- Can stem cells grow in a dormant host?
- Will stem cells be beneficial in reanimating dead brains?
Even our scientists and government are in on the action. DARPA has a $7.6 million grant to focus on tissue and limb regeneration. Hydra Biosciences is working on a drug to target regeneration of the heart - without using stem cells.
Tissue Reanimation.
Naturally, this is all speculation from a futurist, but things that must be considered. Reanimation research is shaky ground, though progress is being made. While British scientist sort out the problematic origins of stem cell cloning, scientists in Germany are truthfully working on reanimation research - and are having success restoring dead brain functions.
Reanimation research at the Max Planck Institutes focuses on restoring functionality to a dying brain after cardiac arrest and reanimating the neural processes. The brain poses a certain problem in reanimating an entire organism, as all other organs and life are tied to the functioning of the brain. Nerve clusters and neurological activities have been restored after an hour of death, but complete reanimation fails as the brain is overwhelmingly affected by cardiac arrest.
Reanimating the 1918 flu pandemic virus seems rather precarious - especially since no one has an immunity anymore. The virus could mutate, react violently with current medicines and turn into a resistant super strain, or perhaps just be itself and kill us all like it used to.
Not to sound like the bearer of bad news, but left unchecked, research into reanimating tissue, organisms and organs could have disastrous consequences. When radiation was first discovered, it killed its finders.



12 thousand infected
1 general stanford Nov 27, 2007 at 7:31 pm
this information is untrue i can confirm its uncofidentiality through through the armed forces .
2 Thomas Weaver Nov 27, 2007 at 7:32 pm
how can you prove this?
3 general stanford Nov 27, 2007 at 7:34 pm
The Division I am with will prove this is untrue all in due time.
4 Thomas Weaver Nov 27, 2007 at 7:34 pm
and what division is that?
5 general stanford Nov 27, 2007 at 7:35 pm
you are not authorized to know that information.
6 Thomas Weaver Nov 27, 2007 at 7:35 pm
why not?
7 general stanford Nov 27, 2007 at 7:36 pm
The Division I am with does not allow someone of your standing to know such information.
8 bryan storm Nov 27, 2007 at 7:36 pm
do you mean like walking flesh eating zombies?
9 general stanford Nov 27, 2007 at 7:39 pm
to everyone viewing this page this information is not true it is based on unknown and false information. there is no threat of zombies or anything else of that matter. furthermore this page will be under investigation from its sources.
General George Stanford
United States Intelligence
10 Sam Nov 27, 2007 at 8:05 pm
Fantastic, but I’m reporting objective information here pulled from publicly available sources, cited at the end of the article. I draw no conclusions, only speculation.
The kind of paranoid nervous statements you make Gen. Stanford only serve to act as backbone for my presumptions. Thanks for letting us know.
11 general stanford Nov 27, 2007 at 11:03 pm
well sam i would like to know where you are getting these so called sources.
12 general stanford Nov 27, 2007 at 11:10 pm
this is a urgent matter that must be dealt with immediately. please contact me at my website listed above. I repeat this is an urgent matter sam i have information you may want to see.
please contact me at my email
gengeorgestanforddivfive@comcast.net
General George Stanford
United States Intelligence
Division Five
Leave a Comment